Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[Download] "People State New York v. Milton Saunders" by Supreme Court of New York * eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

People State New York v. Milton Saunders

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: People State New York v. Milton Saunders
  • Author : Supreme Court of New York
  • Release Date : January 20, 1970
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 63 KB

Description

[35 A.D.2d 591 Page ] Defendant's application was based on his allegation that he had never been informed of his right to appeal from the judgment
of conviction in question, rendered against him in February, 1962 in the former County Court of Kings County. The People opposed
the application on the ground that in February, 1962 no one was under any legal duty to advise defendant of his right to appeal.
Subsequent to the entry of the order herein, the Court of Appeals decided the case of People v. Montgomery (24 N.Y.2d 130),
but we do not feel that decision requires reversal or modification here. Defendant at bar was convicted in 1962 of robbery
in the second degree, unarmed, upon his plea of guilty in satisfaction of an indictment charging him with first degree robbery
and grand larceny and second degree assault. He never appealed; and served his sentence. His mere allegation now that he was
not informed of his right to appeal should not be enough to require a court and the People to take the time and effort to
conduct a hearing. He should allege more, namely, that not only was he not informed but that he was not aware of his right
to appeal and that he would have appealed had he been aware (see People v. Greene, 35 A.D.2d 587). If defendant at bar does
renew his application and a hearing is held at which he shall establish by credible evidence that he in fact was not informed
of, was not aware of, and would have appealed had he been aware of, his right to appeal, the court should resentence him so
that his time to appeal will run anew (People v. Montgomery, supra ; People v. Powe, 34 A.D.2d 961); see, also, People v.
Page, 12 A.D.2d 984). In making its determination the court may consider any past criminal history of defendant and any other
circumstance in relation to the guilty plea which might have some bearing on the question of his awareness of a right to appeal.


PDF Books Download "People State New York v. Milton Saunders" Online ePub Kindle